onsdag 1 januari 2014

Dimridåer och vikten av förståelse

Jag kan inte nog betona hur viktig Broder Nathanaels hemsida är för oss. Oavsett om man är kristen eller ej så är hans artiklar fundamentala för att uppnå förståelse för det som nu pågår i världen --- samt för vilka det är som ligger bakom det hela! Han hjälper oss att se igenom dimridåerna som alla vi ömkliga västerlännigar har omkring oss, vilka f.ö. har lagts ut av det kriminella nätverk som för närvarande råder över vår värld. Vi inser då att att endast den som fruktar väst kristna befolkning har anledning att lägga ut dimridåer och att dessa någon inte vill oss väl, eftersom man annars hade arbetat i det öppna --- och inte som nu i det fördolda! Vad man fruktar är att förlora något som man dåraktigt tror man äger, för sanningen är nämligen den att i denna värld kan man ingenting äga : Allt är oss till låns allenast och måste en vacker dag återlämnas till den det sannerligen tillhör! --- Allas vår Skapare och Himmelske Fader! Allt världsligt tillhör denna värld, inklusive alla världsliga lustar och begär. Denna fruktan att förlora sina ägodelar är vad som driver de sataniska krafterna bakom kulisserna vidare, och som vi alla vet så är fruktan ondskans moder : Ty endast genom att onda ting företaga kan man lindra fruktans pina ... så vida man inte är beredd att släppa taget om sin fruktan och istället förlita sig på det goda inombords. Så länge som man inte är kapabel att lita på sin egen inre ledstjärna och sin egen inre godhet så är man i sanning förlorad, och på detta vis är alltså läget i detta nu för dem som BN tar till orda mot. Deras fruktan är nu så stor att de ej längre är mottagliga för kritik av något slag, något som beror på deras ovilja att acceptera oss andra som deras bröder och systrar. De är och förblir sina egna, förlorade i sitt eget mörker ända till dess att de inte längre bemäktigar med att uthärda ytterligare lidande, utan istället sänker sina huvuden i ödmjuk bön och ber om befrielse från den kontinuerliga smärta som deras revolterande mot Gud ger dem.

söndag 1 september 2013

Eustace Mullins minns tillbaka

My life will be judged worthwhile to the extent that it is of use to others. For this reason, I wish to tell of the things which have happened to me in my struggle against the forces of darkness. It is my hope that others will be forewarned of what to expect in this fight.

During the past thirty years of this struggle, many of the great patriots who gave me, instinctively, their valuable guidance and inspiration, were themselves heavily immobilized by the machinations of international Jewry. They considered their personal losses relatively unimportant, however, compared to the sufferings of the Gentile people who have been enslaved by the Jews.

In the same way, it might seem idle carping for me to mention the murder of my parents by government agents working for the Jews, who wanted revenge against me for my work; not when we consider that sixty-six million Christians have been killed in Russian concentration camps since 1917, all of them murdered by the Jewish Communists who built and operated these camps.

These millions lie nameless and unmourned. But they were no less the victims of the Jews than my parents were — or many other Americans whose sacrifices have gone unrecorded by those who are next on the death list.

No one who has been martyred by the Jews should remain unknown. And no one who has been martyred by the Jews will remain unavenged.

I became the object of the Jews hatred by events which moved in a straight line. Successively, I became the protégé of George Stimpson, the most respected journalist in Washington, who founded the National Press; and of Ezra Pound, the world-famous poet; and of H. L. Hunt, one of the world’s richest men.

Of the three, only Ezra Pound fought the Jews openly. And he suffered grievously as a consequence, spending thirteen years in a hideous, urine-soaked madhouse in Washington D.C.
George Stimpson passed on to me many of the secrets of Washington, including the fact that Felix Frankfurter founded the Harold Ware Cell of Communists and the nature of the Jewish control over J. Edgar Hoover and the FBI. H.L. Hunt fought valiantly to preserve the values of Christian civilization. But he was unable to deploy his money effectively in a battle which was outside of his experience.

I was to visit Ezra Pound several times in the cell in which he was held as a political prisoner and which he aptly termed “the hellhole.”
 
In 1942, when I joined the United States Army Air Force, I had no thought that thirty-six years later, I would still be engaged in a life-or-death struggle with a tenacious and relentless enemy.

I regarded World War II as an unavoidable hiatus in my chosen career as an artist and writer. The war would be over in a couple of years, and I would resume the writing of books which I had already begun. I had no personal desire to ‘slap the Jap,’ or ‘stun the Hun,’ or any of the ‘Tin Pan Alley’ slogans which the Jews had conjured up to herd the Gentile cattle to the slaughter.

Like many of my fellow soldiers, I sensed that the enemy was not really overseas, but was more likely entrenched here on the home front. But also like my fellow soldiers, I knew there was little I could do about it. Almost a year later, I read some material which gave me enlightenment.

Although it seems unbelievable now, during the height of World War II, there was more widespread dissemination of patriotic material on the Jewish conspiracy than there is today. Many dedicated patriots turned out small papers which printed the hard facts. They had long since learned how to survive the daily harassment by FBI agents, ADL agents, and hordes of other ‘home front’ guardians. They were frequently denounced by the paid press.

After reading one of these hysterical attacks, I sent Gerald L. K. Smith twenty-five dollars for some material. This was a large sum at that time, as my pay was only fifty dollars a month. By return mail, I received a large box containing several hundred copies of ‘The Cross and the Flag.’

Theis was the first material I had ever encountered on the Jewish problem. It contained many astounding revelations.

I realized at once that this was not the type of material to be quoted in the usual barracks discussions. Several soldiers had commented that there were informers in the barracks. Although I did not then make the connection, there was to be found in almost every barracks, a particularly obnoxious Jew, usually with a Brooklyn accent. It never occurred to me that these Jews were being as obnoxious as possible in order to goad the other soldiers into making an anti-Semitic remark. Nor did it occur to me that these Brooklyn Jews often had college degrees.

At that time, everyone with college background was ordered to try out for the Officer Candidate School. I did not realize that these Brooklyn Jews remained with the enlisted men for surreptitious reasons. This type of political supervision of the troops is axiomatic in Communist strategy. It was meticulously observed in the American Armed Forces during World War II. In combat zones, officers and enlisted men who had previously voiced doubts about the wisdom of Roosevelt’s crusade to save Communism, were shot in the back by these same intelligence agents who had followed them into the front lines.

While General Eisenhower was cosily tucked away with his British Secret Service ‘Chauffeur’, Kay Summersby, the real decisions were made by his Liaison Officer, Captain Warburg of the Kuhn, Loeb Banking house — a Jewish concern.

The Communist control over the United States Army surfaced during World War II with the selection of General George C. Marshall as Chief of Staff. As Senator Joseph McCarthy later pointed out, Marshall was under Communist Party discipline at all times. This did not interfere with his direction of our war effort, since the goals of the Washington Marxists were the same, the total defeat of the German anti-Communist forces. In the Korean and Vietnam wars, Communists direction of our Armed Forces remained unchanged, even though we were then fighting against ‘Communist’ forces. When General Douglas McArthur tried to oppose this Communist betrayal of our men, he was fired by David Niles, the Jewish Communist who was President Truman’s ‘Aide.’

The Communist recognized that final political control always resided in the military. In Moscow and in Washington, every officer is absolutely responsive to the current ideological line, regardless of any military consideration. This was recently demonstrated when every officer on active duty was ordered to support the giveaway of the Panama Canal, while many retired officers openly opposed it. The most stringent measures are carried out to ensure that no officer is able to form a group to discuss and possibly take action against the high treason of his superiors. When Commander George Lincoln Rockwell surfaced at the Pentagon, there was consternation throughout the high command. At the least sign of any independence or patriotic speech from any officer, the Jewish controlled media immediately raises a hue and cry about ‘Fascism’ and the offender is quickly neutralized.

After receiving the supply of Smith’s magazine, I distributed them in the day rooms to see who would read them. The next day, I toured the day rooms to see if anyone was reading them, and perhaps, to strike up a conversation. Every issue had disappeared. Not once did I see a copy while I remained on the base.

Apparently, I had been followed, and the papers picked up as fast as I had left them.
During my remaining years of military service, I encountered no one with strong political views. My own opinions were those of any young man of the period, hardly committed to any strong ideology. After the war, I enrolled at Washington and Lee University, intending to study law. After two years, I decided I should go to art school, and enrolled at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in Washington, D.C. The school had the usual mongrel types in its student body and a number of ardent Communists on the staff. But it attracted many of the leading writers as speakers. Like others among the ten million veterans, my main concern was in getting on with my career, and I had little concern with politics.

Over night my lack of concern changed.

One of the teachers at the Institute had been visiting Ezra Pound. He suggested I accompany him one afternoon, an offer which rather disturbed me. I thought it unlikely that the man who had edited T. S. Eliot and Ernest Hemingway would be interested in talking to me. But I went along.

The moment I entered the gloom of the insane ward, my former complaisance vanished, never to return.

I suddenly realized that a great writer had been punished by being confined in a madhouse, solely for his political views. In an instant, Pound filled the ideological gap in my life. Never again would I remain silent in the face of injustice.
 
Pound apparently considered me a kindred spirit, and offered to give me ‘my own day.’ That is, an afternoon to visit him alone each week. I accepted. And by the time the next week rolled around, he was waiting for me with food, assignments for research, and errands to run.

Shortly afterwards, he brought up the Federal Reserve System, which I had never heard of. From that day, my work was cut out for me. His concern for his country had been aptly expressed by Charles Dickens in his American Notes, written a century earlier: “I do fear that the heaviest blow ever dealt at liberty, will be dealt by this country, in the failure of its example to the earth.”

The loss of liberty in America, which is occurring before our eyes, means the autocracy will be enthroned throughout the world, and that the freedom which was ours at our birth will never be known by future generations. Olga Ivinskaya, a Russian writer, writes of her years in a Soviet prison camp:
“Sanagian (a fellow inmate) had put down the story of her life in her awkward, uneven handwriting. She came from a working class family and her father—long since dead—had taken part in the Revolution in 1917, for this she heaped curses on his memory.”
In the usual hogwash about aristocrats, we never stop to think that it was the working people of Russia, not aristocrats, who were enslaved by the Communist Revolution. Similarly, in this country, it is the Jewish intellectuals, bankers, and industrialists who are in the forefront of the battle to enslave all Americans and take away their freedom forever. Should we allow this, future generations in the concentration camps will begin their days not with prayers, but with curses on our memory.

I soon began to visit Ezra Pound every day, a routine which I kept up for three years. During this time, I was thoroughly grounded in every aspect of the International Communist conspiracy. Pound said to me: “I am telling you things I didn’t know until I was fifty. You are twenty-five, which means you are getting an extra twenty-five years to do something about it.”

When I went to New York, bankers on Wall Street told me:– “I was here during the crash, but I didn’t know what was going on until I read your book.” I explained that I had had the benefit of Pound’s experience, and his access to much information in Europe which had already been banned in the United States.

To support myself while writing the history of the Federal Reserve System, I obtained a job at the Library of Congress as a stack attendant. This was the same job J. Edgar Hoover had held for several years while he completed his law studies at George Washington University night school.

A few weeks later, because I had done advanced photographic studies at the Institute, I was promoted to the Photography Department. In the next several months, I received two more promotions, as I had studied with one of the finest Japanese photographers. During these months, I was able to see Pound only on weekends, and he suggested I send some of my writings to ‘The Social Creditor,’ a small weekly published in England. I sent them some articles, which they printed, sending me enthusiastic comments.

One day, while going into the National Press Club for my daily luncheon with George Stimpson, a man was handing out copies of ‘Common Sense’ at the front door. I showed it to Pound, an issue containing the Hermann Goering Testament. He suggested I send them articles, and they printed some excerpts from the Federal Reserve research.

One afternoon, a Jew came to the Library of Congress, asking for me. I was called out of the darkroom to see a Jew who was a caricature out of Der Stürmer. He immediately began to cross question me, saying he had been sent from ‘Common Sense,’ and he asked, ‘Who is giving you your material? Where is this information coming from?’

Not wishing to involve Pound, who always faced the possibility of having his daily visitors turned away and being held incommunicado, I explained that I was doing research at the Library of Congress. It was obvious that he didn’t believe me. A gawky small town boy could hardly be privy to the machinations of the worlds most powerful and secretive bankers!
A team of FBI agents was now sent to the Library of Congress to question everyone who had worked with me.

Senator Herbert Lehman, of the Lehman Brothers Banking house, and National Chairman of the Anti-Defamation League, had sent a demand to Luther Evans, Librarian of Congress, that I be fired because of an article I had written for the Social Creditor.

The demand, written on ADL stationery, had been drawn up by the ADL operator, Edelstein, and signed by Lehman without reading it, as he accepted anything which Edelstein brought to him. The article exposed the fact that one Katz, Marshall Plan Administrator, presided over the most of the Marshall Plan material to Communist countries, instead of sending it to the non-Communist countries for which Congress had designated it.

LD: In other words, because of Jewish machinations, money intended by Congress to help non-Communist countries, was secretly diverted to Communist countries where the sole beneficiaries were international Jewry. This was of course fraud and peculation on an unimaginable scale — comparable to the mysterious disappearance of $3 trillion when Rabbi Dov Zakheim was in charge of financial affairs at the Pentagon in 2001.


However, neither of them dared to publicly argue the point, as it would have exposed the fact that Marshall Plan Aid was going to the Communists.

Although I as yet knew nothing of the ADL order that I be fired, I had had a previous contact with Senator Lehman. Pound had noticed an advertisement in the Washington Post that Lehman would be speaking at Howard University on behalf of ‘home rule,’ a plan to wrest control of the District of Columbia from a group of White businessmen and turn it over to the Negroes. Howard University was the Communist training school for Ralph Bunche and many other Negro Marxists. Through the dogged influence of Eleanor Roosevelt, it was the only college in the United States whose entire budget was provided by the Federal Government.

Pound mentioned that Lehman, a typical Jewish degenerate, had a nervous tic, and suggested it would be amusing to see it in action.

When Dave Horton and I arrived at the Howard University auditorium, we found a group of Negroes, eight or ten, the entire audience for the August Senator. Rather put out by the poor attendance, Lehman, a short squat ole clothes dealer type, made a short speech about home rule and opened the floor to questions.

Immediately, Horton and I were on our feet.

“Would Lehman Brothers consider the District of Columbia a safe investment?”—asked Horton. “Will you support Alger Hiss as the first mayor of Washington?”—I asked. Lehman, a rather stupid Jew, was completely bewildered by our questions.

We continued to fire questions at him, as his aides, two young city College Jews, shook their fists at us.

The famed Lehman tic now made its appearance. It was not merely a tic of the eye, the entire left side of his face was twitching steadily and violently.

The audience of Negroes was glaring at us, muttering, ‘Shame,’ as Lehman’s aides rushed him away.

I LATER LEARNED THAT IN THE FOYER OF THE LEHMAN MANSION IN NEW YORK, A SPLENDID FOURTEENTH CENTURY STATUE OF THE VIRGIN MARY, LOOTED FROM ONE OF THE GREAT CATHEDRALS OF EUROPE, STOOD NEAR THE DOOR. FOR THE TITILLATION OF VISITORS, A CIGARETTE WAS PLACED DANGLING FROM HER MOUTH. (Emphasis in original

A few days after our Howard University evening, I was handed a letter of dismissal from the Library of Congress. The FBI interrogations had turned up nothing which could be used against me, and had caused considerable angry comment among the other employees. The letter stated I was being dismissed because I had written an article for the Social Creditor. I was given the option of making a personal appeal to the Librarian, which I did. In Evans office, he asked me, ‘Did you write this article?’

‘Yes,’ I replied. ‘Can you show me one false statement in it?’

‘I’m not competent to do that.’ said Evans. ‘This is not out of my hands. Your dismissal stands.’

‘But I am not a member of any political group.’ I protested. ‘I’ve never voted in my life. You have many staff members who are activist members of militant racial organizations. You have two staff members who do nothing but go through the stacks writing numbers bets all day. Why am I being singled out?’

Evans, who never once looked at me in the eye, jerked open the bottom drawer of his desk, where I glimpsed a half empty bottle of Country Gentleman bourbon. He looked longingly at it, turned to me, and said, ‘Well, that’s all.’
 
MY NEXT JOB: At the Chicago Motor Club, I became editor of Motor News, with a circulation of 250,000. During the next two years, I willingly took on additional duties as editor of the ‘Industrial Editors News Service,’ public relations counselor, and special events organizer. I had been at the club two years and one week with a drawer full of memoranda from my superior, James E. Bulger, praising my work, and thanking me for my new programs, when one sultry August afternoon, two well dressed men strode by Bulger’s secretary, and went into his office and closed the door.

His secretary who was a close friend, turned to me and said, ‘I wonder what that’s all about?
‘I never saw them before.’ I replied.

The men stayed with Bulger for about an hour, and I could hear them arguing with him, but their voices were kept low. Finally, he buzzed for his secretary. She went in, and came back out immediately, and handed me a folded note. I opened it and read, ‘You are allowed five minutes to get your things and get out of the office.’

‘What’s going on?’ the secretary asked me.

I saw the tears were streaming down her face. I showed her the note.

‘I know what’s in it,’ she said, ‘but what’s going on? Mr. Bulger is sick, we’ve got to help him—those men—’. She turned and ran to the restroom.

I put some personal memoranda into an envelope and left the office.

That evening, Bulger’s secretary called me at home. She told me that the two men were FBI agents and that when they demanded I be fired, Bulger flatly refused. This was understandable as I was doing the work of four people. They then threatened him for nearly an hour. He had had five heart attacks in the past several years, and he began to writhe with pain. He begged them to let him call his doctor.

‘Certainly,’ one of the men replied, ‘as soon as you fire Mullins.’

Bulger was then forced to write the note.

After I left the office, the FBI agents accompanied Bulger to the doctor, and then took him to his home, after warning him not to tell me what had happened or to give me my job back.
Being fired from the Chicago Motor Club was the greatest shock of my life. Certainly this was the goal of the FBI harassment. At the age of thirty-five, I had been one of the most active public relations counselors in Chicago, lunching at the best restaurants with the city’s leading executives. Now I was on the street with no prospects.

Even so, I supposed that with my contacts, I would be able to get another public relations job. In the next few weeks, I was surprised that after each interview, I heard nothing more about a job. Friends at the Motor Club then told me that because of pressure from the Club’s Jewish members, Bulger was telling everyone who inquired about references that I was a notorious criminal who was wanted in several states. He never put this into writing, giving out the slander on the phone, after instructions from the Jew who was the Club’s legal counsel. Since I was fired from the Chicago Motor Club in August, 1958, I have never again been able to get a professional job.

After several weeks, I realized it as unlikely that I would get any work in Chicago. I began work on a book about Friedrich Nietzsche, and while doing research at the Newberry Library, I found a great deal of material on Ezra Pound’s career. I wrote him suggesting that I do his biography. He immediately replied that he had been waiting for me to do this, and that I was to be his only authorized biographer.

I then asked Henry Regnery if he could give me an advance on this book. He replied that he could not — though he owned the largest window shade factory in the world, a bank, and other holdings, worth eighty million dollars.

He suggested, however, that H. L. Hunt needed someone to edit a book. I called Hunt and he agreed to pay me a hundred dollars a week. I said that I couldn’t live on that. In fact, I was living on thirty-five dollars a week. Hunt now offered to let me live in his home. At that time, Hunt’s income was ten million dollars a week, and he had accumulated a fortune of three billion dollars.
 
I arrived at Hunt’s home in Dallas with one battered suitcase and an old Plymouth, purchased a year before for one hundred dollars, with the entire front end smashed in.

Hunt and I immediately established complete rapport, as he had lived for years out of a suitcase, traveling in the back-country picking up the oil leases which were the basis of his fortune. I resided in his best guest room, one which had always been occupied previously by Senator Joseph McCarthy when he came to Dallas. Hunt and I settled down to work on the book ‘Alpaca.’

After several months of intensive work,the book was completed and I became restless. By this time, Hunt had installed me in an office next to his own, and whenever someone called him, he would say, ‘Why don’t you check with Mullins on that?’ I realized he was only using me for a buffer, but it was a flattering situation for a penniless writer to be referred to as the confidential assistant of the world’s richest man. However, I remained a penniless writer, and he remained the world’s richest man.

I began to realize I should be getting back to work on the Pound biography, and one afternoon, I told him I had to return to Chicago. He was completely surprised, and I saw that he was hurt and disappointed by my decision. Nevertheless, I have always thought of him with affection and admiration, and he seemed well disposed toward me on later occasions when I talked to him in Dallas and in New York.

Although I knew nothing of it at the time, my association with H. L. Hunt had driven the Jews into a furious campaign of ‘harassment’ against my parents. The conspirators were terrified that Hunt might finance my publications or a political organization, although at the time I had no organization to which he might donate money.

I knew that my father had had a serious coronary attack in 1956, but I was not told until years later that the attack had been brought on by a series of vicious interrogations by Army Counter Intelligence Corps agents. My mother later told me they were determined to make my father reveal the names of persons financially supporting my travels and writings. Since no one had ever given me a cent, there was nothing he could tell them, but they refused to believe him.

Knowing he had Wednesday afternoons off from the store in which he worked, two agents waited for him in his car. They forced him into the car, drove him to the top of a nearby mountain, and interrogated him for several hours, telling him they were going to throw him off the mountain. At one point, he tried to escape from the car. They knocked him unconscious, drove him back to the store, and left him in the parked car. He finally came to, and drove home. The next day, he had a severe coronary attack, from which he never completely recovered.

My parents did not dare tell me these details, out of a desire to protect me, as they knew I would kill someone for these atrocities. Nevertheless, I knew they had been interrogated and I wrote to the Secretary of Defense. I received an answer, admitting that my father had been interrogated, and giving the names of the two men who had interrogated him. Some weeks later, I tried to contact these men in Washington. I was told they had been sent on a mission to Guam, and that the plane had crashed with all aboard being killed. The letter with the men’s names has since disappeared from my files.

While I was with H. L. Hunt in Dallas, the FBI began to visit my parents. Their telephone was tapped, and they received harassing telephone calls during the night. The harassment and brutality of this campaign was intended solely to provoke me into some drastic action. I come from mountain people, and we never forget an injury, even if it takes fifty years to wreak our revenge. My temper remained under control only because my parents refused to let me know what was happening to them, and the ADL-FBI provocation failed.

Their campaign was intensified, however, and one evening in 1961, my father, whose heart conditions had steadily gotten worse during this harassment, received a telephone call from a known FBI provocateur, ‘We’ve just sent out a national alert to pick your son up.’

My father dropped the phone. “They’ve finally got him’ he said to my mother, as he collapsed.
He was taken to the hospital where he died of massive heart failure.

More than three years went by before my mother told me what had happened.

Of course, there had never been an alert, as I have never been arrested by anyone.

In ‘My Life in Christ,’ I openly accused Lyndon Johnson, who was then President of America, of murdering my father, although he had only been acting for Herbert Lehman, the Jew who had been supporting his bid for the Presidency.

The only outcome of all this was that during Johnson’s Presidency, every copy of my book that I mailed out was destroyed by the Post Office — until I began insuring each copy.

söndag 10 mars 2013

Dostojevskij

Publicerar här Broder Nathanaels senaste inlägg. Han ger oss här ännu en inblick i Dostojevskijs konstnärskap som än bättre förklarar saken:

The Return Of The Idiot
One of the most loved characters in the history of fiction is Dostoevsky’s Prince Myshkin, the central figure in “The Idiot.”
Myshkin is portrayed as “The Beautiful Person” — A “Holy Fool” — who returns to Russia from a Sanitarium in Switzerland where he was treated for ‘mental illness.’
The child-like character of Myshkin, who without calculation speaks with stark honesty, disarms and disquiets a host of characters: nihilists, the rich, and even the passionate and earth-bound.
Rogozhin is one such “passionate” who meets the Prince face to face in the train car returning from Switzerland as it approaches St Petersburg.
When Rogozhin—taken up with the child-like Prince and wishing to tempt him—promises to introduce him to a beautiful woman,
the Prince demurs saying, “I don’t know women at all.”
“You come out as a holy fool,” Rogozhin laughs, “God loves your kind.”
Myshkin soon encounters a fallen society…and in our hopes of seeing him changing it, ends up a total failure. The world is not changed. In fact, the world becomes even worse.
Dostoevsky then resurrects the character of Prince Myshkin in another “holy fool,” Alyosha, in his final novel and masterpiece, “The Brothers Karamazov.”
When asked by a troubled girl if at Easter the Jews kill a child and eat it, Alyosha answers, “I don’t know.”
This has infuriated the Jews ever since who whine and carp that Dostoevsky should have put in Alyosha’s mouth a plain and unambiguous “No.”
But Alyosha’s answer stands.
A similar scene appears in The Idiot when the Prince walks up the staircase of Rogozhin’s dark and gloomy apartment and sees a painting on the wall, Holbein’s “Christ Taken Down From The Cross.”
Struck by the horror of death exuding from the crucified corpse of Christ, Myshkin exclaims, “One can lose his faith looking at this painting.”
And when later in the story a heated discussion reaches the boiling point, The Idiot proclaims:
“There’s more wealth, but less strength in the world; the binding idea of Christ’s Resurrection doesn’t exist anymore; everything has turned soft, everything is rotten, and people are rotten.”
Do Jews at Easter really kill a child and eat it?
Alyohsha won’t say no. And Prince Myshkin looking at the corpse of Christ is about to lose his faith.
The Return of the Idiot faces the plight of America. We’ve lost our faith.
I mean, the Jews, depicting for us in the press only a dead Christ, have taken it from us.

onsdag 26 september 2012

Dostojevskij




















Nedan följer en tre år gammal artikel av Broder Nathanael om den store ryske författaren Fjodor Dostojevskij, en man som för övrigt var djupt from - en sann kristen. Broder Nathanael:

FEODOR DOSTOEVSKY LEFT US A “PROPHECY” of the threat to Christian civilization by emancipated Jewry.

In his book, Diary Of A Writer, published in 1877, Dostoevsky penned a journal entry, entitled, The Jewish Question. With alarming and frightening foresight, (by which he penetrated into today’s events), Dostoevsky predicted a growing domination over social and political affairs by the Jews with their newly acquired rights:


"The Jews look forward to world domination. This requires them to maintain their own close-knit identity. If the Jews are given equal legal rights in Russia, but are allowed to keep their ‘State within a State,’ they would be more privileged than the Russians. The consequences of this situation are already clear in Europe."

Expressing his concern regarding Jewry’s agenda for world domination, Dostoevsky demonstrated how Jewish bankers had taken over Europe by the mid 1800’s:

"It is not for nothing that everywhere in Europe the Jews are reigning over the stock exchanges, not for nothing that they control capital, not for nothing that they are masters of credit, and not for nothing, I repeat, that they are the masters of all international politics.
What is coming is the complete triumph of Jewish ideas, before which, sentiments of humanity, the thirst for truth, Christian feelings, and the national and popular pride of Europe must bow.
And what will be in the future is known also to the Jews themselves: Their reign is approaching, their complete reign!"

IN LIGHT OF JEWRY’S CONTROL of Europe’s financial & social sphere, Dostoevsky then voiced his fears regarding Jewry’s threat to Russia:

"What if there were only three million Russians and there were eighty million Jews? How would they treat Russians and how would they lord it over them? What rights would Jews give Russians?
Wouldn’t they turn them into slaves? Worse then that, wouldn’t they skin them altogether? Wouldn’t they slaughter them to the last man, to the point of complete extermination?"

DOSTOEVSKY BROUGHT HIS PROPHECY to a head by predicting that Jewry’s religious dictates, coupled with the control of the “Yid and his bank,” would bring the Gentiles into complete subjugation:

"It is impossible to conceive of a Jew apart from his religion. They are all waiting for their messiah, all of them, from the lowest Yid to the highest and most learned philosopher and rabbi-Kabalist. They all believe that their messiah will unite them in Jerusalem and bring by his sword, all nations to their feet.

The Yid and his bank are now ruling over everything: over Europe, education, civilization, socialism, especially socialism, for he will use it to uproot Christianity and destroy its civilization. And when only anarchy remains, the Yid will be in command of everything.
For while the Jew goes about preaching socialism, he will stick together with his own, and after all the riches of Europe have been wasted, the Yid’s bank will still be there."

Scary, Isn’t it? And, Very Much Up To Date Is It Not?… Brother Nathanael Kapner, A Former Jew, Reporting…


Så långt +BN. Nedan följer nu ytterligare ett citat från Diary Of A Writer:

"It is possible to outline, at least, certain symptoms of that status in statu -- be it only externally. These symptoms are: alienation and estrangement in the matter of religious dogma; the impossibility of fusion; belief that in the world there exists but one national entity, the Jew, while, even though other entities exist, nevertheless, it should be presumed that they are, as it were, nonexistent. `Step out of the family of nations and form your own entity, and thou shalt know that henceforth thou art the only one before God; exterminate the rest, or make slaves of them. Have faith in the conquest of the whole world; adhere to the belief that everything will submit to thee. Loathe strictly everything, and do not have intercourse with anyone in thy mode of living. And even when thou shalt lose the land, thy political individuality, even when thou shalt be dispersed all over the face of the earth, amidst all nations -- never mind, have faith in everything that has been promised thee, once and forever; believe that all this will come to pass, and meanwhile live, loathe, unite, and exploit -- and wait, wait."

torsdag 9 augusti 2012

Broder Nathanael

Klicka på länken så kan du titta på BN:s  alla videos : http://brovids.com/?p=79

fredag 22 juni 2012

Lloyd George: om Hitler

"I Talked to Hitler" by the Right Honourable DAVID LLOYD GEORGE

I have just returned from a visit to Germany. In so short time one can only form impressions or at least check impressions which years of distant observation through the telescope of the Press and constant inquiry from those who have seen things at a closer range had already made on one's mind. I have now seen the famous German Leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods - and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country - there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvellous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook. He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement has made a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war - broken, dejected, and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and importance. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers. There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change. One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic, dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, a resolute will and a dauntless heart. He is not merely in name but in fact the national Leader. He has made them safe against potential enemies by whom they were surrounded. He is also securing them against that constant dread of starvation, which is one of the poignant memories of the last years of the War and the first years of the Peace. Over 700,000 died of sheer hunger in those dark years. You can still see the effect in the physique of those who were born into that bleak world. The fact that Hitler has rescued his country from the fear of a repetition of that period of despair, penury and humiliation has given him unchallenged authority in modern Germany. As to his popularity, especially among the youth of Germany, there can be no manner of doubt. The old trust him; the young idolise him. It is not the admiration accorded to a popular Leader. It is the worship of a national hero who has saved his country from utter despondency and degradation. It is true that public criticism of the Government is forbidden in every form. That does not mean that criticism is absent. I have heard the speeches of prominent Nazi orators freely condemned. But not a word of criticism or of disapproval have I heard of Hitler. He is as immune from criticism as a king in a monarchical country. He is something more. He is the George Washington of Germany - the man who won for his country independence from all her oppressors. To those who have not actually seen and sensed the way Hitler reigns over the heart and mind of Germany this description may appear extravagant. All the same, it is the bare truth. This great people will work better, sacrifice more, and, if necessary, fight with greater resolution because Hitler asks them to do so. Those who do not comprehend this central fact cannot judge the present possibilities of modern Germany. On the other hand, those who imagine that Germany has swung back to its old Imperialist temper cannot have any understanding of the character of the change. The idea of a Germany intimidating Europe with a threat that its irresistible army might march across frontiers forms no part of the new vision. What Hitler said at Nuremberg is true. The Germans will resist to the death every invader at their own country, but they have no longer the desire themselves to invade any other land. The leaders of modern Germany know too well that Europe is too formidable a proposition to be overrun and trampled down by any single nation, however powerful may be its armaments. They have learned that lesson in the war. Hitler fought in the ranks throughout the war, and knows from personal experience what war means. He also knows too well that the odds are even heavier today against an aggressor than they were at that time. What was then Austria would now be in the main hostile to the ideals of 1914. The Germans are under no illusions about Italy. They also are aware that the Russian Army is in every respect far more efficient than it was in 1914. The establishment of a German hegemony in Europe which was the aim and dream of the old pre-war militarism, is not even on the horizon of Nazism. ...
Daily Express (London), November 17, 1936

tisdag 29 maj 2012

Marinas högintressanta kommentar

Följande kommentar om läget i Ryssland lämnade Marina idag på BN:s hemsida:
Marina:
Folks, Be careful with any Western sources reporting on any events in Russia or Belarus as well. They are very biased and hardly ever reflect any truth. For example, they constantly talk about demographic crisis in Russia. There is no demographic crisis in Russia at the moment. There WAS indeed a real CRISIS in the 90s when the drunkard Yeltsin was the country’s president but the real power was in the hands of the Jewish oligarchs. This crisis, however, has been gradually arrested. Just recently we heard good news - the population increased by one million. It may not yet be a lot but it is a real progress if we consider what was happening before. You will, however, never hear anything about it in the Western media. About Islam in Russia. There are no Muslims going on the rampage in Moscow. Moscow is not another Paris or London. If you come to Moscow or Russia illegally and you look like someone from Central Asia you keep a low profile because you will be immediately deported if the police find you have no papers. Russia does accept some guest workers but only from former Soviet Republics which include Central Asian countries, Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia, Moldova, Azerbeidjan etc. However, you have to get the right kind of visa and it is not easy to get it. You need to know the language and need to pass special tests. There are two groups of Muslims in Russia: native Muslims and Muslims from former Soviet Republics. The first group are Russian citizens - they have always been part of Russia. The second group are treated as foreigners. It’s difficult for them to get Russian citizenship. Most of them simply come to work and leave. Only a small number - usually well educated and open-minded ones stay in Russia. Russia’s native Muslims are ethnically diverse, they include: Tatars, Bashkirs in the Ural region and Chechens, peoples of Dagestan, Ingush, Karachays, Circassians and a few other groups in the Caucasus region. But in the Caucasus there are also large numbers of native Christians, usually ethnic Ossetians and Abkhazians. Tatars are the largest Muslim group in Russia in terms of numbers. They are also the most Russianized group. More than that - there is a large number of Orthodox Christian Tatars. You can meet someone called Ivan Ivanovich Ivanov and he will be a Tatar and a Christain and you will meet someone called Rinat Akhmetovich Islamov and he will also be a Tatar and also a Christian. There are countless numbers of churches - some of them recently built - all over Tatarstan (http://www.kazan.eparhia.ru/temples/). Of course in the past Russia had some conflicts with its Muslim neighbors. These Muslim neighbors could be a nuisance but they never posed a real threat to the Russian Christian culture. Russia was able to deal with them. The major blows to the Russian culture came not from Muslims but from the West, from its anti-Christian ideologies which were put into by anti-Christian Westernized, mostly Jewish, ideologues. If we look at the situation now, we can see that the major enemy of the Russian culture and Orthodox Christianity are not Muslims but the so-called opposition which is mostly made up of Yeltsin’s former politicians, cosmopolitans, sexual perverts, radical feminists, anarchists etc. Needless to say, lots of them are either Jewish or have links with Jews. All of these people hate Putin and hate the Russian Church. They look up to the West for inspiration and they are the major apostles of Cultural Marxism. Putin’s strategy does not involve a direct attack on the Jews for being Jews. Such a strategy would be a disaster. We only have to remember how much noise was being made in the Western media when Khodorkovsky was arrested, tried and put in prison and other oligarchs had to flee. Putin was careful not to play any “anti-Semitic” card as this would give his enemies and opponents a reason to make him into another Hitler. There are still rich Jews in Russia but they have to be careful. No one will put them in prison just for being Jewish but they might end up behind bars for being anti-Russian or working against Russia’s national interests. So, they have to be careful what they do with the money and what deals they make and with whom. At the same time Putin has been giving a lot of support to the Church and the rebirth of Christianity. Religion has made a real comeback. Christianity is the best remedy to cure the world from the Zionist disease.

lördag 12 maj 2012

Marinas tre senaste kommentarer

Här är de tre senaste kommentarerna lämnade av Marina på BN:s två senaste inlägg. Dessa ger oss mer förståelse för läget i det forna Sovjetunionen, ett ämne där de flesta västerlänningar är noviser, och ett ämne där vi västerlänningar på det stora hela köpt allt med hull och hår som vårt korrupta media delgivit oss genom åren.
Marina:
There is one guy whom the international syndicate of usurers would love to declare an anti-Semite but they have not been able to. They have not been able to even though this guy has made lives miserable for three super-rich Khazarians who, at one stage, had practically entire Russia in their pocket. He has been able to snatch the Zionist hydra by its neck but he has done it in such a way that hydra is not able to accuse him of anti-Semitism. The guy I have on my mind is Vladimir Vladimirovich. The three Khazarians should also be well known to everyone. One is Mr Khodorkovsky. He had ambitions to become Russia’s president, instead he ended up in a Russian prison. The second one is Mr Berezovsky. He is “in exile” in London - one of the major centres of the said syndicate. He used to have a grand palace in Moscow that cost about 200 million dollars, not to mention his other riches. He has been concocting all kinds of plots to ditch Vladimir Vladimirovich or to ruin his reputation but so far he has not been very successful. The so-called Litvinenko affair may have found receptive audience in the West but, fortunately, not in Russia. In the 90s the rich Khazarian Oligarchs, not infrequently, hired psychopaths from prisons to get rid of those who got in their way, be they police investigators, journalists or witnesses. Russians know what these people are capable of. The third one, Mr Gusinsky, has become a proverbial “wandering Jew.” He has been on the run for quite a while, not being able to find a permanent residence anywhere, not even in Israel. Rumours say that if he goes to Israel, he might end up being extradited to Russia. Few people get as much bad press in the Western media (as well as in the media of the so-called NATO allies) as does Vladimir Putin. If you get bad press in the Western media, it means you are in the other camp - you are the enemy of the Zionist World Order. Vladimir Vladimirovich has been a very talented politician. No doubt he owes his skills to his former KGB training. It is impossible to wage an open war against Khazarians but it is possible to act through stealth, to use other means to limit their power. Khodorkovsky, Magnitsky and others were not put in prison because they are Jews but because their business operations were illegal, because they ordered assassinations and were involved in other crimes. That they happen to be Jews - bad luck. Whose fault is it that so many Jews get so rich and so many of them do it through deceit, blackmail and other crimes? At the same time Putin has been actively promoting Christianity and Christian values. As we all know, Christianity is what Talmudists resent most.
Marina:
Wotan, There is a group of people who distrust Putin because of his KGB background. Unfortunately, these people are usually not very well familiar with the realities of the USSR and with its history. They tend to assume that the Soviet Union was run by the Jews till the last days of its existence. Here they are wrong. The history of the Soviet Union is, however, more complex. Indeed, the Soviet state was founded by the predominantly Jewish Bolsheviks and its early history was dominated by the Jews - especially Leibe Bronstein (known as Trotsky). The situation began to change a little under Stalin when most of the early Bolsheviks - almost all of them Jews - were accused of cosmopolitanism and therefore put on trial and executed. Jews obedient to Stalin still had a lot of power but not as much as before. The real change came with WWII. Then the Russian element began to take over - slowly but definitely. A more massive Russian takeover took place after the death of Beria. The Jews were there but their power was diminishing and it was diminishing very fast. Eventually it diminished to such an extent that Jews hoping to make a good career in politics in the Soviet Union had to hide their identities. Yuri Andropov could be a good example. Till this day even in Russia no-one really knows his real identity. Everyone sort of knows that he was probably half Jewish but his ethnic origins are very vague because he had gone to extreme measures to hide them. In the late 60s and more so in the 70s the Soviet Union adopted a very anti-Zionist attitude. You only need to read literature of that period, be it popular or academic to see how much Zionism was discredited and despised. It was portrayed as one of the major arch-enemies of the Soviet State. The Soviet Union was evolving into what some experts like to describe as National Communism. The exodus of the so-called Soviet Jews was the direct result of the changes in the political climate. The Jews no longer “felt at home” in the very entity which they themselves had originated. It was only after the collapse of the Soviet Union - in the 90s - that the Jews experienced their Renaissance and began to take over power in the territories of the former Soviet Union with the exception of Belarus. They have not been able to get control over Belarus thanks to the tough politics of Lukashenka. But in Russia under Yeltsin they were experiencing their Jewish Golden Age. And they are still experiencing their Golden Age in Ukraine (Lots of Jews who got scared of Putin found their refuge in Ukraine). Coming back to Putin, KGB training in the former Soviet Union involved hatred of Zionism. As a KGB officer Putin was taught to see Zionism as a threat to the USSR as well as to other countries. More than that, KGB officers were trained to distrust the Jews because of their double or multiple loyalties. The Global Zionist Order knows well about it and that’s why they fear Putin so much. On top of all that, some of the closest buddies of Putin who have power in Kremlin are also former KGB agents. They are all ethnic Russians, except for one who is a Tatar.
Marina:
Heinrik Von Manshtein, Vladimir Vladimirovich is VERY BAD NEWS for the Global Mafia. They are in a state of confusion now and don’t quite know what new strategy to adopt. The truth is that the Global Zionist Mafia already have half the world under their control, now they want to get Russia because once they get Russia, they will be able to control the whole globe. They were lucky for a while. They had Russia in their claws already in the 90s but, unexpectedly, Putin spoilt their plans. As a result Russia is now back on its feet challenging the Mafia’s plans to impose its rule on everyone. The Global Elites know that Russia is armed to the teeth and is still arming itself. They therefore know that any military attack is not a good idea. They have been trying to use other means to destroy Russia but these means have not been very successful. The servants of the Global Elites underestimated Russians’ natural conservatism. In order to undermine Putin the so-called opposition has been staging all kinds of protests, demonstrations and other events but the problem with this so-called anti-Putin opposition is that they have no popularity in Russia. They have no representation in the Duma because they do not have any popular support. They have less than 5 percent support if not even less, 2 percent. There are several important reasons why they are not popular. Firstly, the so-called opposition is made up of people who used to be in power in the 90s and created chaos, anarchy and general ruin which everyone very well remembers. They made the country sink to the lowest level of misery, demoralization and dehumanization. Secondly, large numbers of these people - interestingly enough - are either Jewish, half-Jewish or have some connection with Jews. Thirdly, an overwhelming majority of these people are liberals in the real sense of this word. They promote gay parades, gay marriages, radical feminism, anti-Christianity, anti-patriotism, and similar ideas. With this type of ideological baggage, plus their predominantly Jewish ethnic background, the anti-Putin opposition (and they really hate Putin) have no chances with the Russian society. 95 percent - if not even more - of Russians are against gay parades, gay marriage, radical feminism, internationalism and any other Trotskyist nonsense. That’s why it will not be easy to stage a colour revolution in Russia. So now the Global Elites are really getting desperate. Their anti-Putin agents are not attractive to the Russian society, Putin is back in power promising to build more churches and more weapons. Another thorn in the flesh for the Global Elites, though of smaller proportion, has been the President of Belarus Lukashenka. Like Putin, Lukashenka gets very bad publicity in the Western media. The Blue Revolution failed miserably with Lukashenka getting more or less 90 percent support. What the Mafia cannot stand is the fact that in Belarus the apostles of Western democracy (a very small proportion of society) often end up in prison while, for example, Russian nationalists who come on holiday to Belarus from neighbouring Russia are allowed to walk around free, to organize festivals, meetings and other events. But the Mafia’s agents have only themselves to blame. Whose fault is it that every time the pro-Western anti-Lukashenka liberals demonstrate they create violence, smash buildings, beat the police etc. The Russian nationalists, on the other hand, behave nicely, never smash anything.

torsdag 26 april 2012

Det Kristna Bysans

Under står att läsa en oerhört intressant beskrivning av hur det kristna Bysans fungerade. Texten är hämtad från den andra halvan av Broder Nathanaels senaste artikel. Lade bara upp halva artikeln här. Inledningen finns att läsa på BN:s hemsida.
CHRISTIAN BYZANTIUM extended from the Balkans to Western Europe during the 4th through 15th Centuries AD. Thus, the Byzantine Empire, (not taught, of course, in Jew-run Public Schools and Colleges), was known to its inhabitants as “Rhomania” because Constantine the Great, Byzantium’s first Emperor from 306 to 337 AD, established the empire’s center in Constantinople as the “New Rome.” In addition to being a Christian civilization in which the Church worked in “symphony” with the State, (as today in Putin’s Russia), Byzantium had one further characteristic, namely, its claim to be the direct continuation of the Roman Empire, a claim maintained until its fall in 1453 at the hands of Muslim invaders. One essential feature of the Byzantine Empire was its policy toward the Jews. This policy was codified by Emperor Justinian in the 6th Century AD, popularly known as, “The Code of Justinian.” JUSTINIAN’S CODE FORBADE Jews from holding civil office and teaching positions. Even part of the Orthodox Church’s “canon law” prohibited its members from seeking out “remedies” from Jewish physicians. Compiling various laws regarding the Jews that were established before him into a legal codification, Justinian forbade Jews:
+ To engage in proselytism; + To marry Orthodox Christian women; + To possess Orthodox Christian servants; + To hold office or honors in the Roman state; + To build new synagogues; + To read the Old Testament in Hebrew but rather in Greek which did not cut out the prophecies that pointed to Jesus Christ; + To use Judaic interpretations of the Old Testament; + To bear witness in court against an Orthodox Christian; + To hold teaching positions in Roman schools or as private tutors.
The culmination of Justinian’s “Codex” was the denial of Roman citizenship to the Jews and relegating them to the rank of second class citizens.
In spite of Jewry calling Justinian an “anti-Semite,” the Orthodox Church not only honors him as a great Emperor but also as a great saint. THE SOLUTION TO THE JEWISH PROBLEM is for Europe to return to its Christian roots—the historical Church—in which the “evangelical” error that posits the Jew as “chosen” and having some “special” role to play has no place. Neo-paganism and idyllic myths that salivate over Indo-European “gods” promoted by White-Identity Websites will only provide the Jew with yet another stepping stone to greater hegemony over the political affairs of European society. Wagner (a profound master) and his operas indeed are milestones in the evolution of classical music. But to elevate Wagner’s Nordic Wodens and Fricas to realms of some new European “reformation” is not only laughable but historically shallow. “Europe Is The Church and The Church Is Europe!” said the great 20th Century historian, Hilaire Belloc. It is via the historical Church, and ONLY the historical Church, that the Jewish siege of Europe can be opposed, dismantled, and ultimately destroyed.
Som vi nu inser, efter att ha läst det ovan skrivna, så är Kristendomen av största vikt för vårt välbefinnande. Vi inser även att det som nu sker i Ryssland, där Putin återkristnar sitt hemland, även måste ske här hos oss i väst snarast möjligt.

onsdag 25 april 2012

Vikten av att återupprätta kyrkan

BN:s hemsida så kan man som bekant läsa många högintressanta kommentarer. Marina är en som ofta skriver om situationen i Ryssland och dess grannländer, något som alltid är läsvärt. Från senaste artikeln av BN hittar vi dessa båda kommentarer av just nämnda person, Marina:
The best way for people in the West to undermine the Jewish power and influence is to re-embrace Christianity. Of course, it is not easy to force yourself to believe in something if you have been a non-observant person, like it is the case with many people in the West. But the issue at the moment is not faith as such. For many people faith is something that needs time to develop. Those people who don’t have strong faith should at least show their solidarity with and support for Christianity. That’s the best way to start. For 70 years Soviet Union was an atheistic country. The Church was almost non-existent and it was impossible to be openly religious. Most people had hardly any contact with religion. Churches, with a few exceptions, were museums. Yet, the Christian religion in Russia has made an incredible comeback. Today even members of Russian Communist Party are religious. The religious renaissance in Russia is so strong that it really worries the so-called liberals most of whom happen to be Jews. Their main worry is Putin who, needless to say, is an observant Christian and does not hide it. More than that, Putin supports massive church construction all over Russia. So far, 23 thousand (23,000) churches have been rebuilt, renovated, or built, but Putin plans to build more. See: www.vidania.ru/index.html 200 churches are being built in Moscow alone. In partly Muslim Tatarstan there is a very large number of rebuilt and newly-built churches. See: www.kazan.eparhia.ru/temples/ The Jewish element in Russia is not as strong as in the West. Moreover, the Jews have to be careful because they know all too well that Russians know all too well who the Bolsheviks were and who was involved in the murder of the Tsar and his family. Still, even in Russia, Jews have been trying to contaminate the society with decadent ideas. They have not been very successful, though. They tried to attract a certain number of people to their cause but the whole project backfired very badly. The liberal - predominantly Jewish - element encourages all kinds of anti-religious activities. Not so long ago there was a series of attacks against the Church - they included blasphemous activities inside churches or even vandalism. In a few cases the perpetrators were so-called feminists. In other cases they may have been either drug-addicts or other misfits. The feminists are now under arrest awaiting trial. The events were followed by debates on TV. It was amazing how in one debate Mr Aleksandr Prokhanov called Svanidze (a Jew) and his team (most of them Jews): you are a tribe of thieves, sell-outs and liars. He did not call them “Jews” but it was obvious to everyone who he had on his mind. Last Sunday there was a great event. All over Russia there were large protests against blasphemy and church vandalism. In front of the Christ the Saviour Cathedral alone there were 65 thousand people in support of Christianity.
I en kommentar omedelbart därefter säger Marina:
An overwhelming majority of Russians were very religious. The only people who became flexible in religious matters were the intelligentsia and parts of the elites. The situation in pre-revolutionary Russia was not like it was in pre-revolutionary France. Some French peasants were religious, some were not. In Russia all peasants were religious. More than that, in France a patriot was a good revolutionary. In Russia, if you were a patriot, you were a counter-revolutionary. The Revolution in France was mainly a French product and so it was a national event, whereas in Russia it was a Jewish product, an international event.
Som vi själva kan läsa så är Kyrkan lösningen på alla våra problem, och detta har man insett till 100 procent i Ryssland, där man alltså nu har byggt/återuppbyggt 23000 kyrkor! Man går således åt totalt motsatt håll än vi här i väst, vilka stänger och sedan ofta river våra kyrkor. Jag börjar nu alltmer önska att Sverige tas över av ryssarna och de sedan även tar hit präster och sin kristendom, för som utvecklingen är här hos oss f.n. så är vår svenska kyrka mer eller mindre dödsdömd.
Marina lämnade strax efteråt två nya kommentarer, båda intressanta och läsvärda, och jag postar dem här. Marina:
etterling, I do not doubt that rich Jews made their contribution to the French Revolution but I am reluctant to believe that they were the only major force behind it. We have to be honest - one of the reasons why the French royal order collapsed was corruption and decadence among its elites. Why didn’t a similar disaster take place in the Habsburg Empire (later to become Austro-Hungarian Empire)? Because the Habsburg elites (at that stage of the European history) were more responsible, more devoted to the well-being of their subjects, more conservative and more committed to the Christian tradition. Decadence was afflicting the French upper classes long before the Revolution and it was spreading to the other sections of society. Rather than profess Christianity many aristocrats preferred to get involved in Grand Orient Freemasonry or other weird cults. More than that, the French elites made friendly alliances with the Ottomans which could be simply called anti-Christian alliances. The last king of France sent his military mission to train the Turks in naval warfare and fortification building. I am not defending or excusing the French Revolution. As we all know, nothing good resulted from it. And I am not trying to be anti-French. I like France, I like its culture too and particularly its unique Christian Medieval heritage. I’m only trying to show some of the factors that led to that disaster. The Jewish factor was there but it was not the only factor in this case.
Marina:
My replies to Wotan’s and Hans’s comments which were in the fomer thread. Wotan, About Kaliningrad, yes, there are some conservative circles in Russia (they include military people, first and foremost) who believe that the Kaliningrad oblast could or even should be returned to the Germans. This is mentioned, on top of all that, in Основы геополитики (The Foundations of Geopolitics), which is a major textbook in the General Staff Academy of Russian Military. Is it ever going to happen? Certainly not in the near future. Why? Because the last thing that the Russians would like to see in the Kaliningrad territory are the NATO bases. Germany would have to free itself from the NATO dependence and create its own army. Hans, I can understand why Gorbatchov is popular in Germany. He initiated many changes which led to the German unification. Yes, he was a reformer and some of his changes were not only good but necessary. It must be kept in mind, however, that many changes had already been initiated by his predecessors though they were not clearly pronounced. Gorbatchov became more serious about them and more determined. Unfortunately, he mishandled the whole process. That’s why he is not popular in Russia. What do I mean by “mishandled”? For example, he made all kinds of concessions to the West but did not ask for anything in return. Germany could be the best example. He withdrew the Soviet troops from East Germany. Good. It was the right thing to do. But why did he do it without asking the Americans and others to withdraw their troops from West Germany? It was all nice and good to dismantle the Warsaw Pact but why wasn’t the whole NATO structure dismantled? His intentions and his good gestures should have been more conditional. If we had had Putin in his place, the situation would look completely different today. Most likely there would be no NATO in Germany. Today we not only have NATO in Germany but also in Poland, in Romania, in Hungary and so on. We also have NATO in the Balkans. More than that. He showed no concern for Russian minorities in the former Soviet Republics. They were all allowed to go free on no conditions whatsoever. As soon as they had their freedom, the native populations started persecuting the non-native peoples: Russians, Ukrainians and even other natives (local ethnic minorities). The reason why South Ossetians and Abkhazians are pro-Russian today and want to become part of the Russian Federation is because the Georgians were persecuting them. I would not call Gorbi exactly a Trotskist but in many ways he behaved like one. He allowed himself to be used by the ideologues of the NWO. Look at him today. He criticizes Putin and the Russian Church. His so-called Gorbatchov Foundation based in San Francisco is nothing else but an extention of the Soros mafia.

fredag 20 april 2012

Messias kom för att besegra döden

Här är Broder Nathanaels senaste video. Fantastiskt som alltid. Inkluderar även en kommentar av sign. Marina, som hon lämnade till videon på BN:s hemsida. Marina har lämnat många andra intressanta kommentarer tidigare. Det jag finner extra intressant med hennes och andra östeuropeers kommentarer är all den kunskap de har om Östeuropa, kunskap som alla däröver innehar, men som få här hos oss ens känner till en bråkdel av.
Marina : "If Europe wants to be a great civilization again, it must re-convert to Christianity. European Civilization was (and still is though in a somewhat deformed form) a Christian civilization. Sure, other cultures contributed to it. The Hellenic and Roman factors were also very important, just as Germanic, Celtic, Slavic etc. But the major and the most significant factor was Christianity. If we look at European art, music and architecture, all of them are tied up with Christianity. If we look at European institutions and laws,then again the main factor there is Christianity. Monogamy, rejection of the institution slavery etc are attitudes strongly tied up with Christianity. The global liberal elites, international Judeo-Mafia and their Saudi allies with their bases in the Anglosphere, Tel Aviv and Riyad all focus their forces on the destruction of Christianity. The Judeo-Mafia is well aware of the power which traditional Christianity possesses, and for this reason this Judeo-Mafia is getting frustrated with the current rebirth of Christianity in Russia. This rebirth is so massive, so strong and so genuine that the Judeo-Mafia is becoming more and more desperate and thus increasingly resorts to all kinds of provocative activities directed against the Russian Orthodox Church for which it uses the so-called feminists, gay activists and other low-lifes. Perhaps people on this forum heard something about a blasphemous show performed in the Christ the Saviour Cathedral in Moscow by a group of young so-called feminists. It wasn’t the only blasphemous performance. The same women did the same in two other churches in Moscow. More than that, just before the Easter there were a couple of other incidents in other places in Russia. In one place holy icons were badly damaged, the image of Christ on the cross was cut several times with a knife. In another place an attempt was made to set a church on fire. The person of the Patriarch was also attacked by certain elements in the media. Fortunately, these ugly incidents are taken very seriously in Russia. There has been a lot of discussion about them on TV and in other sources and the culprits have been identified. They all come from the so-called liberal groups all of which hate Putin and all of which support globalism abd decadence of all kinds. Russian people are no fools. In countless discussions on this subject many people asked: how come there is so much attack on Christianity? Why don’t we have similar incidents in synagogues or mosques? Needles to say, a war is being waged against Christianity. In different countries it assumes different forms, of course. As far as Islam is concerned, it is true to say that Shiite Muslims have more allies among non-Muslims than Muslims. Russia, India, Brazil, even China all support Iran. Shiite Muslims are not likely to have any conflict with Christians, certainly not Iran. One of the greatest enemies of Shiite Iran is Saudi Arabia. There we are, there is our problem. Most Muslims are not Shiites, but Sunnis, and thus they are more likely to be influenced by the Saudis than by Iranians. On top of all that, Saudi Arabia has a lot of money which it invests in spreading a Salafist/Wahhabi version of Islam in all parts of the world to which many Sunnis get attracted. The problem with Sunni Muslims is that they have been playing into the hands of the global powers who are using them as their main executioners and mercenaries. It all started in Afghanistan, with the war against the Soviets and, as recent history demonstrates, it did not stop there. The global elites have been using Muslims in many places to destablize the situation there. The main victims have almost always been Christians. One of the best examples could be Chechnya. Dzhohar Dudaev whom the West often portrayed as a secular Chechen fighter was not as secular as he seemed. In the early 90s he travelled to Saudi Arabia and met there a Bosnian Haris Silajdzic and an Albanian Sali Berisha. The other two also travelled to Saudi Arabia. The situation of the non-Chechen population in Chechnya was deteriorating under Dudaev. Chechen gangs would attack Russians or Ukrainians, drive them out of their houses, rape their daughters, extort money out of them. That’s why it finally came to the 1st Chechen War. The war was a disaster. It could not have been otherwise under Yeltsin and his mostly Jewish advisors. The place became a mess. Soon it became one of the hotbeds of Islamic (Salafist) radicalism. All kinds of foreign Islamic mercenaries began to settle there and introduce a new order. The result was such that Russians and Ukrainains living 300 km away from Chechnya (in the Volgograd territory) did not feel safe in their homes. Women and girls were abducted by these mercenaries. Many disappeared for good. Boys were abducted as well and made either into Islamic warriors or slaves. Life became unbearable. Only with the coming of Putin the 2nd Chechen War the situation returned to normal. I should say here that in the early 90s there was a very intensive persecution of Russians and Ukrainians in Chechnya under Dudaev. 40 thousand civilians lost their lives. Not including soldiers in that list. What happened in the Balkans everyone should know. The war in Bosnia did not start with Serbs but with Islamic mercenaries armed by NATO and financed by Saudi Arabia. The result - a Muslim country was created where none had existed before. Then came Kosovo. Again, the result was another Muslim country, an exodus of Christian Serbs and destruction of ancient Christian churches in the area. What we see in the Middle East at the moment is very similar. The chief puppet masters are the global elites, the Judeo-Mafia, the Saudis. The puppets are Muslim mercenaries. The primary victims of the show: Christians. Look at Palestine, Irak, Egypt, Syria."

måndag 12 mars 2012

BN förklarar vad profeterna menade

Här är en kort kommentar som BN lämnade idag till en läsare, Glory B, som klart förklarar vad GT handlar om. Vi får även veta att många s.k. anti-sionister även är rabida anti-kristna, d.v.s. fiender till kyrkan och kristendomen, som norske Bjerknes:

@Glory B

I have gone over this SO MANY times already my dear sister in Christ.

In the Old Testament:

“Israel,” “Zion,” “Jerusalem,” when spoken of by the Holy Prophets, refers to *The Church,* and NOT to Faithless Jews.

This is the teaching of the Orthodox Church which understands the cultural mileau AND the Spiritual complexion of the Old Testament.

Bjerknes whom you quote is an enemy of The Church. Bjerknes is fiercely anti Christian and does not have the competence to come anywhere near grasping the cultural, historical, redemptive, Spiritual meaning of the Holy Old Testament.

Vi behöver även inse att detta är en uppgörelse mellan teister och ateister, i alla dess skepnader och former. Utan en teistisk syn på livet och tillvaron så kan man inte ta till sig det som nu pågår och heller ej uthärda insikten om detsamma. En materialistisk livssyn är en livssyn som är kommunistisk, sekularistisk, humanistisk och anti-kristen, som då således gynnar dem som f.n. är allas våra fiender.

onsdag 22 februari 2012

En intressant kommentar

Läste följande kommentar på Broder Nathanaels hemsida idag och fann den intressant nog att posta här på bloggen. Fann f.ö. raderna om inkvisitionen i Spanien extra intressanta, då vi där får veta vad den egentligen handlade om - om det påstådda är sant, något jag tror det är. Etterlings kommentar är ett typexempel på de högintressanta kommentarer som läsare lämnar varje dag. Bäst är att läsaren själv beger sig till BN:s blogg och läser vidare.

"Dear Wotan.

It seems that we share certain suspicion on anything written about Germany.-
Throughout the bulk of the ritual literature covering German people with a black shadow of criminality that seems to have no end, it is easy to conclude that there is not a single one going beyond the surface of facts and explaining the causes of German justified resentment against Jews, but very well explained by another exceptional Jew: Benjamin Freedman.-

So, for those following a natural and logic deduction, not coming from the books, the answer would be: “Yes, the Jews brought defeat, hunger and misery to the German people, but it wasn’t right to send them to the concentration camps for gassing,” etc., and here we jump into another lie constructed upon the base of the camps existence.-

What happened in the camps, which were labour camps, and the MSM tarnishing of Hitler as a “millionaire” executioner, has been and would be a long standing matter dividing people for a long time to come.-

As a proven danger to the general welfare of the German people, Jews were rightfully denied access to public office.-

And, as a consequence of Jew World Congress declaration of war and boycott against Germany they were rightfully secluded in concentration camps, as England did with South African Boers and the USA did with the Japanese and Japanese Americans.-

As Germany needed manpower for the war effort, they were rightfully put to work, and were paid for their work, lagergeld was the currency used for canteen provision and other needs.-

As it happens in every community people dies, and in certain places they are cremated, more when lack of space or more when the cause of death is typhus.-

More to that is the fact that allied bombing prevented and ddisrupted camp´s food supply.-
As the ONU stated in 1948, total death in concentration camps were 300,000, figure comprising all origins or nationalities.-

As Michael Walsh rightfully states, lets go and check still available camp registry books to have the final number and put an end to the maligning of German people.-

To all this, it must said that being a Jew in 1933-1945 Germany was not a necessarily or sufficient reason qualifying for a concentration camp passport, prove to the fact is that 30% of German practicing physicians in 1941 were Jews with more patients allocated than Gentile MDs.-

Unsympathetic toward the Jews didn’t mean that Hitler was not a practical man who cared more for the general benefit of decisions irrespective of the Mein Kamf merits.-

Perhaps, also against the generalized, wrong and vulgar opinion profusedly and intermittently spread by MSM, in the matter of sincere conversions we must take a serious look at the Spanish Inquisition, not a Church contrivance, as it usually seems to point the ignorance, but a King’s decision in consultance with the Church, to determine in every single case, when a “new” Christian was honestly a disciple of Jesus, and not a secretly Talmudic follower.-

To that end, even members of the clergy were under scrutiny, like Fray Luis de Leon, a prominent Church figure of the times.-

Thanks to the Inquisition, as a Government Intelligence Office, Spain was able to hold together the Kingdom and the Empire, against the combined intrigues of England and unsincere “converted” Jews, for over 300 years.-

Once the French troops invaded Spain, archives and records of the Inquisition fell into freemasonry hands, so the story is told by them, and Spain fell into 100 years of civil war, anarchy and lost the empire.-"

onsdag 25 januari 2012

Slutord

Concluding Passage From the Epilogue of Nilus


By Sergius Nilus (1905)

According to the testament of Montefiore, Zion is not sparing, either of money or of any other means, to achieve its ends. In our day, all the governments of the entire world are consciously or unconsciously submissive to the commands of this great Supergovernment of Zion, because all the bonds and securities are in its hands; for all countries are indebted to the Jews for sums which they will never be able to pay. All affairs—industry, commerce, and diplomacy—are in the hands of Zion. It is by means of its capital loans that it has enslaved all nations. By keeping education on purely materialistic lines, the Jews have loaded the Gentiles with heavy chains with which they have harnessed them to their “Supergovernment.”

The end of national liberty is near, therefore, personal freedom is approaching its close; for true liberty cannot exist where Zion uses the lever of its gold to rule the masses and dominate the most respectable and enlightened class of society.

“He that hath ears to hear, let him hear.”

It is nearly four years since the Protocols of the Elders of Zion came into my possession. Only God knows what efforts I have made to bring them to general notice—in vain—and even to warn those in power, by disclosing the causes of the storm about to break on apathetic Russia who seems, in her misfortune, to have lost all notion of what is going on around her.

And it is only now when I fear it may be too late, that I have succeeded in publishing my work, hoping to put on their guard those who still have ears to hear and eyes to see.

One can no longer doubt it, the triumphant reign of the King of Israel rises over our degenerate world as that of Satan, with his power and his terrors; the King born of the blood of Zion—the Antichrist—is about to mount the throne of universal empire.

Events are precipitated in the world at a terrifying speed: quarrels, wars, rumours, famines, epidemics, earthquakes—everything which even yesterday was impossible, today is an accomplished fact. One would think that the days pass so rapidly to advance the cause of the chosen people. Space does not allow us to enter into the details of world history with regard to the disclosed “mysteries of iniquity,” to prove from history the influence which the “Wise Men of Zion” have exercised through universal misfortunes, by foretelling the certain and already near future of humanity, or by raising the curtain for the last act of the world’s tragedy.

Only the light of Christ and of his Holy Church Universal can fathom the abyss of Satan and disclose the extent of its wickedness.

I feel in my heart that the hour has already struck when there should urgently be convoked an Eighth Ecumenical Council which would unite the pastors and representatives of all Christendom. Secular quarrels and schisms would all be forgotten in the imminent need of preparing against the coming of the Antichrist.

Det är svårt att förstå när man läser Sergius Nilus slutord från Protokollen att dessa rader skrevs 1905 --- d.v.s. för över HUNDRA ÅR sedan! --- eftersom världens länder REDAN DÅ var skuldsatta till internationella storbanker på sådant vis att skulderna aldrig kunde återbetalas! Redan för över hundra år sedan så befann sig således hela världen i ekonomiskt slaveri. Man inser då att läget för oss alla idag måste vara sju resor värre!

onsdag 28 december 2011

Förord

Här kan vi läsa förorden till Maurice Pinays The plot against the Church:

INTRODUCTION TO THE AMERICAN EDITION

This historically important book will, in all probability, be attacked as being anti-Semitic. Let nobody be led astray or distracted, however, from a serious and scientific consideration of the incontrovertible facts here set out. We are concerned with a major factor of history, and more especially of the history of the Christian Church. No crude, negative and destructive anti-Semitism comes into question. That the Jews have played a tremendous and not always beneficial role in the whole story of mankind is obvious; that their activities were not always friendly to Christianity and to the non-Jewish peoples is equally obvious, and there is an enormous fund of evidence from Jewish as well as other sources of unshakable authority to prove this.

This work of great erudition displays not alone a knowledge of events past, but shows also that its compilers had had knowledge of events to come in some immensely important respects. As readers will see from the foreword to a German-language edition, the first edition of this work, in Italian, began by stating that its authors knew that the purpose of calling the Second Vatican Council was to persuade it to declare that the Jews were not responsible for the Crucifixion of Our Saviour, i.e., they were not guilty of deicide, and this book appeared before the first session of the Council. Subsequently, as forecast, this proposal was put forward, great pressures were applied to get it accepted, and something, even if diluted, was agreed upon at the end.

Now it cannot be denied, even apart from the essence of the proposal itself, that the fact that any Jews, however representative or otherwise of most of their co-religionists and co-racialists, could do what they had done at the very highest levels of the Catholic Church, is a matter of tremendous significance to Catholics and all others, even to non-Christians.

And not only was it possible to find men at the summit of the Hierarchy to further this project, but the Council appeared to contain a large number of Bishops who, at the very least, did not seem to understand the importance of the problem.

None can sit in judgment on those concerned; it is understandable that the Jews want to “improve their image”, especially as they have the power to do so. The lessons to be drawn are, surely, not that the Jews as such or any who have been misled should be the objects of severe criticism, but that the facts, the truth concerning all matters of great importance, and especially when they affect the purity and influence of the Church, should be made widely known. In this all Churches should help with a sense of urgency.

However, it should be pointed out to the Jews concerned that instead of trying to improve their reputation and increase their influence by fostering deceptions and attacking basic Christian traditions, they would serve their own true interests best by first setting their own hearts and attitude toward others aright. Again and again they have overreached themselves over the centuries, and then complained at the results for which they alone were responsible.

In particular, this recent initiative in Rome has merely served to draw the attention of intelligent and decent men to a matter of immediate concern to all. It is the obvious duty of all who may read this book to make its contents known and to encourage all their friends to acquire, read and spread it.

THE EDITOR
St. Anthony Press
Los Angeles, California
February 15, 1967




INTRODUCTION TO THE ITALIAN EDITION

The most infamous conspiracy is in progress against the Church. Her enemies are working to destroy the most holy traditions and thus to introduce dangerous and evil-intended reforms, such as those Calvin, Zwingli and other false teachers once attempted. They manifest a hypocritical zeal to modernise the Church and to adapt it to the present day situation, but in reality they conceal the secret intention of opening the gates to Communism, to hasten the collapse of the free world and to prepare the further destruction of Christianity. All this it is intended to put into effect at the coming Vatican Council. We have proofs of how everything is being planned in secret agreement with the leading forces of Communism, of world Freemasonry and of the secret power directing these.

It is intended to first carry out a probe and to begin with the reforms which encounter less resistance from the defenders of Holy Church, in order to then gradually extend the range, as weakening resistance allows this.

In addition, we have confirmation of what will still be unbelievable for those who are not initiated, namely that the anti-Christian forces have at their disposal, in the ranks of Church dignitaries, a veritable “Fifth Column” of agents who are the unconditional tools of Communism and of the secret power directing it. For it has been revealed that those cardinals, archbishops and bishops, who form a kind of progressive wing within the Council, will attempt to bring about a break through shameful reforms, whereby the good faith and the eagerness for progress of many devout Council Fathers will be deceived.

The assurance has been given that the Progressive block forming at the beginning of the Synod will be able to count upon the support of the Vatican, in which, so it is said, those anti-Christian forces possess influence. This appears unbelievable to us and sounds more like boastful arrogance by the enemies of the Church than sober reality. However, we mention this, so that one sees how far the enemies of Catholicism and of the Free World risk revealing themselves. Apart from the dangerous reforms in the doctrine of the Church and her traditional policy which stand in open contradiction to what was approved by the preceding Popes and Ecumenical Councils, it is desired that the Excommunication Bulls uttered by his Holiness Pope Pius XII against the Communists and their lackeys be declared nullified.

In this manner the effort is made to establish a peaceful coexistence with the Communists, which on the one side would be harmful to the regard for Holy Church in the eyes of Christians who fight against materialistic and atheistic Communism and on the other side weaken the morale of these fighters, hasten their defeat and would have as a consequence dissolution in their own ranks, in order in such a way to ensure the worldwide triumph of Red totalitarianism. Concern is taken that Protestants and Orthodox are in no way invited who fight heroically against Communism, but rather more only those Churches and Church counsellors who stand under the influence of Freemasonry, of Communism and the secret power directing them. In this manner the Freemasons and Communists disguised in priestly robes, who have usurped the leading posts in such churches, work together concealed and in a subtle way, but also very effectively, with their accomplices who have infiltrated into the Catholic clergy.

On its side the Kremlin has already decided to refuse known anti-Communist prelates an exit visa, and only to allow their unconditional agents or those who, without being the latter, have bowed out of fear of Red reprisals, to travel from the satellite states. Thus at the Second Vatican Council the Church will experience the silence of those who could defend her best of all and could enlighten the Holy Synod concerning what takes place in the Communist world.

This will undoubtedly seem incredible to those who read it; but the events at the Holy Ecumenical Council will open their eyes and convince them that we are speaking the truth. For it is there that the enemy intends to play a trump card, whereby it, so we are assured, will have on its side unconditional accomplices among the highest Church dignitaries. A further disastrous plan, which is being prepared, is that the Church shall contradict itself, so as a result to sacrifice its regard with the faithful; for later it will be broadcast that an institution which contradicts itself cannot be divine. With this proof they wish to desolate the Churches and achieve that the faithful lose their confidence in the clergy and abandon them.

It is intended to cause the Church to declare that what it has represented for centuries as bad, is now good. Among such manoeuvres spun for this purpose one particularly stands out on account of its importance, and refers in fact to the conduct of Holy Church towards the damned Jews, as Saint Augustine calls them; and this in reference both to those who nailed Christ to the cross, as also to their descendants, who are both archenemies of Christianity. The unanimous doctrine of the great Church Fathers, that “unanimis consensus Patrum” which the Church regards as a source of faith, condemned the unbelieving Jews and declared the struggle against them to be good and necessary.

For example, in this struggle, participated, as we will prove by means of irrefutable evidence, the following Saints: Saint Ambrose, Bishop of Milan, Saint Jerome, Saint Augustine, Bishop of Hippo, Saint John Chrysostom, Saint Athanasius, Saint Gregory of Nazianzus, Saint Basil, Saint Cyril of Alexandria, Saint Isidore of Seville, Saint Bernhard and even Tertullian as well as Origen, the latter two during the period of their indisputable orthodoxy. In addition, the Church fought energetically for nineteen centuries against the Jews, as we will likewise prove by means of reliable documents, and among which are found the following: Papal Bulls, Protocols of the Ecumenical and Provincial Councils as well as the highly renowned Fourth Lateran Council and many others, the teachings of Saint Thomas of Aquinas, of Duns Scotus and of the most important doctors of the Church. In addition we will quote Jewish sources of indisputable authenticity, like the official Encyclopaedias of Jewry, the works of famous rabbis as well as of the most well known Jewish historians.

The Jewish, Freemasonic and Communist plotters now have the intention at the coming Council of utilising, as they assert, the lack of knowledge of most clergy concerning the true history of the Church, to execute a surprise coup by adopting the standpoint at the assembled Holy Ecumenical Council that anti-Semitism must be condemned, as well as every struggle against the Jews who, as we will elaborate, are the wirepullers of Freemasonry and of international Communism. They would like the infamous Jews, whom the Church has regarded as evil for the course of nineteen centuries, to be declared good and beloved of God. As a result the “unanimis consensus Patrum” would be contradicted, which laid down exactly the opposite, as well as what also found its expression through various Papal Bulls and Canons of Ecumenical as well as Provincial Councils.

Since the Jews and their accomplices pillory every struggle within the Catholic Church against the wickedness of the former, as well as the plots directed against Christ Our Lord, as antisemitism, we will likewise reveal in this book that Christ Himself, the Gospels and the Catholic Church can be included among the sources of antisemitism, since they campaigned for nearly two thousand years against those who denied their Messiah.

With the condemnation of Antisemitism, which at times is called Antisemitic racialism, it is wished to attain that his Holiness the Pope and the assembled Council in condemnation of Antisemitism experience the catastrophic event that the Church contradicts itself, and therefore, without giving account to this, silently also condemn Christ Our Lord Himself, as well as the Holy Gospels, the Church Fathers and most Popes, among them Gregory VII (Hildebrand), Innocent II, Innocent III, Pius V, and Leo XIII, who as we will show in this book, have fought bitterly against the Jews and the “Synagogue of Satan”.

With such condemnation it would be successful to simultaneously place countless Church Councils in the dock, among them the Ecumenical Councils of Nicaea and the Second, Third and Fourth Lateran Councils, whose Canons we will subject in this book to a thorough investigation, and which carried on an energetic struggle against the Hebrews. To put it in few words, the infamous plotters have the scheme in mind that Holy Church, by its condemning Antisemitism, condemns itself, whereby one can easily amplify the disastrous consequences.

It was already attempted at the last Vatican Council, even if in disguised form, to alter course in the traditional doctrine of the Church, when it was successful by means of a surprise manoeuvre and lasting pressure, to influence countless Church Fathers to signing “a Postulate in favour of the Jews”. Misusing the Apostolic zeal of the devout prelates, it was first spoken of a summons to conversion of the Israelites, which regarded from the theological viewpoint is an intention without fault; but later they inoculated the secret poison in form of assertions, which, as we will reveal in the course of this work, stand in open contradiction to the doctrine which Holy Church has laid down in this respect.

But upon this occasion, when the “Synagogue of Satan” believed it had secured the approval of the postulate on the part of the Council, God, who always stands by His Church, prevented the mystical body of Christ from contradicting itself and fructifying the plots of its thousand years old enemy. The Franco-Prussian war broke out unexpectedly. Napoleon had to hastily withdraw the troops protecting the Pontificate, and the army of Victor Emmanuel prepared to take Rome. Therefore the 1st Holy Vatican Council had to be hastily dissolved, and the prelates returned to their dioceses, before a general discussion concerning the postulate in question was able to be begun.

This was, however, not the first time that divine providence held up such a misfortune by means of something extraordinary. History shows us that it has done it in numerous cases, whereby it mostly made use of the Popes and devout prelates as its medium; among the latter we include Saint Athanasius, Saint Cyril of Alexandria, Saint Leanero, Cardinal Aimerico, and even such humble monks as Saint Bernhard or Saint John of Capistranus. In other cases than those previously mentioned, it even made use of ambitious monarchs, as the example of Victor Emmanuel, the King of Italy, reveals.

When in the middle of the past year we experienced how the enemy was preparing renewed attempts to unleash a plot which would open the gates to Communism, prepare the collapse of the free world and deliver Holy Church into the claws of the “Synagogue of Satan”, we began, without losing any time, to collect documents and to write the following work which is intended to be not so much a book with a certain disputed tendency, but rather an ordered summary of Council records, Papal Bulls and all kinds of documents and sources, from which we leave out those whose reliability or truthfulness is doubtful, and select those which possess indisputable truth.

In this book, not only is the plot uncovered which Communism and the “Synagogue of Satan” have entered upon against the 2nd Vatican Council, but also the preceding conspiracies, which were recorded in the course of nineteen centuries as cases of precedence, are subject to a thorough illumination. For what is intended to occur at the new assembled Holy Synod, has already occurred repeatedly in the past centuries. In order to grasp what will occur to the full extent, it is therefore essential to know the cases of precedence as well as the nature of that hostile “Fifth Column” infiltrated into the bosom of the clergy. This purpose is served by the extensive investigation of the Fourth Part, which rests upon a faultless proof of sources.

Since in addition attention is drawn to the possibility that the Holy See and the Second Vatican Council might abandon certain traditions of the Church in order to grant aid to the triumph of Communism and of Freemasonry, we lay at basis of the two first parts of this work a minute study, whereby we cite the two most serious sources concerning what one can call the quintessence of Freemasonry and of atheistic Communism, and investigate the nature of the secret power directing it. Even if the fourth part of this book is the most important, then nevertheless the first three and above all the third make comprehensible the plot threatening Holy Church in its entire circumference. This plot is not restricted to its activity during the coming universal Synod but extends far more to the entire feature of the Church. For the enemy has already calculated that, if for some reasons at the Holy Synod strong defensive forces awaken against its planned reforms and these should bring about the failure of its intentions at the Second Vatican Council, it will use at a later point any kind of opportunity to return to its plan, in which respect it would know how to utilise the strong influence which it pretends to have with the Holy See.

We are naturally convinced of the fact that, in spite of the intrigues of the enemy, the support which God always grants His Church will also cause their criminal machinations to fail this time. It is also written: “The Powers of Hell shall not triumph over it!”

Unfortunately, in writing this very documentary book, we have used more than fourteen months, and there remain only two until the opening of the Second Vatican Council. God will help us to overcome all resistance, in order to have ready the printing of this work either by the beginning of the Synod or at least before the enemy can cause the first harm. Though we are also aware that the Lord God will not permit a catastrophe, nevertheless we must keep before our eyes what an outstanding Saint expressed: that, although we know that all depends upon God, we should nevertheless act as if everything depended upon us. And as Saint Bernard said in a similar grave crisis to that of the present: “Pray to God and hit out with the stick.”

Rome, the 31st August 1962. The Author.




FOREWORD TO THE AUSTRIAN EDITION

Due to the numerous requests that have reached us from the ranks of the Austrian and German clergy, we have decided to print the Austrian edition of the book “Plot Against the Church.”

The Fathers of the Second Vatican Council, to whom this work was dedicated, had occasion to establish in the course of the Holy Synod that our warning voice with regard to the existence of a veritable plot against the most holy traditions of the Church and its defensive powers in the face of atheistic Communism found their full justification through the course of the first part of the Holy Council. This shows that our assertions correspond to a tragic truth.

The events of the coming months will provide our readers with the confirmation that our revelations rest upon an incredible but regrettable reality. The enemies of the Church renewed the attempt at the first sitting of the world-embracing Synod, by means of their accomplices in the high clergy, to abnegate or to narrow the tradition of the Church and its character as a source of revelation. This had already been striven for before them by the Waldenses, the Hussites and other Mediaeval heretics, as well as later by Calvin, Zwingli and additional false teachers; only that this time all this is fought for under the cloak of the high ideal, inspiring us all, of Christian unity, whereas the heretics of those times cited for substantiation of the same thesis further diverse and sophistic arguments.

To attempt that the Church deny the tradition of its character as a source of doctrine and to admit such an attribute only to the Holy Bible, more or less equates to the intention of causing it to contradict itself. This would accordingly mean that that which had been maintained for almost twenty centuries to be white was now declared to be black; and in fact with the devastating result that the mystical body of Christ, on grounds of contradiction, would forfeit its respect in the eyes of the faithful, since indeed an institution that contradicts itself in its essence can with difficulty be called divine.

A step of this kind would bring Holy Church into such an impossible situation that it could not be justified through the wishful image of the longed-for Christian unity, whose realisation at the moment would be very problematical. But should this dream become fact upon such an absurd basis, then this would signify that Holy Church recognises it has been caught up in error and its faithful would as a result turn in masses to Protestantism, whose essential postulate has always been from of old to recognise solely and alone the Bible as the source of true revelation and to refuse such a character to the tradition of the Catholic Church.

It is incomprehensible that the enemies of Catholicism and their accomplices in the high clergy have possessed the audacity to go so far. This also proves that what was prophesied in our book written before the Holy Council has found its confirmation through the launching of the same and that the enemy possessed infiltrated accomplices in the high clergy, who occupied the highest positions. As we in fact learned from well-informed sources, upon appearance of this book and after its distribution among the Council Fathers, the enemies first made a halt from bringing before the Council more daring proposals, which apart from the programme of the day they had kept in readiness for the last few days of the Council. Among such proposals was found that which had the aim of demanding the lifting of the Excommunication Bulls directed by Pope Pius XII against the Communists and their lackeys, as likewise the establishing of a peaceful coexistence between Church and Communism, and finally the condemnation of Antisemitism.

This step in retreat, which was forced by reason of the accusation in this book, may only be of partial duration. It is hoped that a careful propaganda worked out in agreement with the Kremlin will soften the resistance of those defending Holy Church in favour of the setting up of a peaceful co-existence with atheistic Communism. It is intended to attempt to weaken the defensive powers of the Church and of the free world, in which the support of the Red dictator can be relied upon, who in return would release the prelates imprisoned for many years, address letters of good wishes to his Holiness the Pope, and display further signs of visible friendship towards the Church. All this in order to bring weighty arguments in favour of the accomplices of the Kremlin, who have infiltrated into the high clergy, to give power to a lifting of the excommunication Bulls, and to bring about a pact of the Holy See with Communism.

In alliance with certain accomplices, who have nested themselves in the highest spheres of the Vatican, it is even planned in Moscow to take up diplomatic relations between Holy Church and the atheistic as well as materialistic Soviet State under the pretence that, as a result, an easing of the religious persecution in Russia could be introduced.

In reality it is the aim of the Kremlin and its agents from the ranks of the Church hierarchy to demoralise the Catholics as well as the heroic clergy who in Europe and the rest of the world fight heroically against Communism, in that they wish to provide the impression that the latter are in fact not so bad, after the Holy See has decided to take up diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union and other Communist states.

It is therefore also intended to cripple the fighting spirit of the North American Anticommunists; for through this step they would see themselves weakened in their struggle against the dark forces, which seek to draw even the United States into the Communist chaos. In a word it is intended, as we have already made clear in the introduction to the Italian edition, to cripple the defensive powers of the free world and to level the way for the final triumph of atheistic Marxism.

But the arrogance of Communism, of Freemasonry and of the Jews goes so far that they already speak of bringing the next Papal election under their control with the intention of placing one of their accomplices in the distinguished college of Cardinals on the throne of Saint Peter. Therefore they intend, with aid of the influence that they claim to have in the Vatican, to exercise pressure upon his Holiness the Pope, whose health is under much strain, in order to get him to appoint a large number of new Cardinals, even if the latter should exceed the highest number provided for. In this manner they will attain the necessary number of supporters, which is intended to secure the election of a Pontifex who will transform Holy Church into a satellite in the service of Communism, Freemasonry and the “Synagogue of Satan”.

But the forces of the Antichrist do not reckon with the support which our Lord God will grant to His Church, in order to prevent that such a manoeuvre gains upper hand.

It suffices to recall that this is not the first time in history that such an attempt has been experienced. As we prove in this book by means of undoubtedly authentic documents, it was successful for the powers of the “devilish dragon” to enthrone a Cardinal as Pope who was directed by the forces of Satan and at times made it seem as though the latter might be the Lords of the Church. Christ, our Lord, who has never abandoned His Church, provided, however, such devout men as Saint Bernard, Saint Norbert, Cardinal Aimerico, the Fathers of the Councils of Etampes, Rheims and Pisa as well as those of the Second Ecumenical Lateran Council, with the courage to act and armed their hands. They all divested Cardinal Pierleoni, this wolf in sheep’s clothing who for many years was able to usurp the throne of Saint Peter, of his Papal dignity, excommunicated him and attributed to him the role of Anti-Pope, which fitted him.

The plans of the Kremlin, of Freemasonry and of the “Synagogue of Satan” are, however advanced they may seem, nevertheless nullified by the visible hand of God. For as in all times men will arise like Saint Athanasius, Saint John Chrysostom, Saint Bernard and Saint John Capistranus, who hold firm to the inspiration and strength which Christ, our Lord, chooses to provide them with, in order in this or that form to cause the disastrous plot to fail, which once again the dark forces of the Antichrist instigate to aid to victory the worldwide triumph of totalitarian Imperialism from Moscow.

We saw ourselves compelled, in the first Italian edition, to leave out eleven chapters of the fourth part from this book; and in fact by reason of the haste we had to distribute this work among the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council, before the beast could cast forth the first blows of its paws. But since we have more time at our disposal in the printing of this edition, we have added the eleven chapters in question, which are of fundamental importance for the better understanding of the devilish plot that threatens Holy Church in our days.




PREFACE TO THE GERMAN EDITION

The following book was compiled by a group of Idealists, who are Catholics of strict belief and who, as Catholics, firmly believe that the Catholic Church is now passing through one of the most dangerous periods in its history.

In order to reveal, what dangers threaten the Catholic Church, in particular from International Communism and also from other International organisations, this Idealist group undertook the enormous task of compiling and editing this book, using numerous documents from the Middle Ages and recent times.

The Italian edition has already appeared and is already in the hands of the high clergy and other interested parties. Editions in other languages are in preparation.

The authors believe that it is vital that the German Catholic Church has this work in its hands, in order from the documents summarised in this work to be able to gain authentic information concerning historical facts from the struggle and life of the Catholic Church.

The authors must beg forgiveness that it was not possible to once again edit the German work stylistically. They know that the style in many chapters leaves much to be desired, and that repetitions also occur, which could have been prevented. The authors can only promise their highly esteemed readers that all these faults will be avoided in an eventual new edition. But they hope, nevertheless, that this work will find recognition and interest, and that their idealistic and selfless work for the well-being of our Catholic Church at least succeeds in informing the German leaders of the Catholic Church about historical facts that are certainly completely unknown to the public.

Madrid, 1963. The Authors.




INTRODUCTION TO THE SPANISH EDITION

A SENSATIONAL BOOK

The facts confirm that the term “sensational” applied to the book “Plot Against the Church” (Complot Contra La Iglesia) is not exaggerated. Following the first Italian edition, distributed in the Fall of 1962 among the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council, the press of different countries of the world began to make commentaries on this book, the reading of which is of capital importance not only for Catholics, but also for all free men.

It can be stated without fear of exaggeration that no book in the present century has been the object of so many commentaries in the world press; virulently unfavourable were those of communist newspapers and those controlled by Masons or Jews; and extremely favourable were those commentaries of some Catholic newspapers, which are independent of those obscure forces, and which have had, in addition, the courage and the possibility to express their points of view freely. Even one year after the distribution of the first Italian edition in the Vatican Council, the press of different countries of the world is still occupied with this extraordinary book — a thing truly unusual in matters of publicity.

In order that the reader may be informed of the importance of this work, we quote here some interesting paragraphs that the Rome correspondent of the Catholic newspaper “Agora” of Lisbon, edition of March 1, 1963, page 7, tells his readers:

“We are going to refer to a publication which came out some time ago in Rome. In addition to other information, we were able to obtain a copy of this book, which in two months became a bibliographic rarity... The book was printed in a Roman publishing house, but when the present authorities in Italy, the Christian Democrats, favourable to Marxism, took note of its publication, the copies of the thick volume of 617 pages had already been distributed among the Fathers of the Ecumenical Council. A fact which produced alarm both in the Vatican government as well as in the diplomatic world and in parties of the left. For several days the printing house was visited by the highest police authorities, who obtained only the statement that the printing of the book had been ordered, and that the cost of the edition had been paid in full. The leftist press attacked it furiously...”

“The exceptional importance of the book resides principally in one fundamental element, and that is, whether the book has one or several authors. Any person of elemental culture can divine that the compilation has been made by clerics. Naturally, the most diverse versions have appeared in respect to this matter. There are those that affirm that they (the authors) were Italian prelates, in collaboration with elements of English Catholicism; others speak of a group of priests including some bishops from an unidentified country of Southern America... This work, because of the enormous importance of its scrupulous, erudite, and minutely detailed documentation, is not just one more of those products of anti-Semitism based on the ‘Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion’ (which are in no way used in the book). In conclusion, in the pages, in the arguments, and in the style of the book, is revealed the presence of Catholic clerics, in battle against the eternal heresy, which has always tended to subvert the religious, ethical, and historical bases of Catholicism, employing successively Simon the Magician, Arius, Nestor, the Albigenses, and in the present day the leftists of the Ecumenical Council.”

So much for the quotations of the interesting commentary made about “The Plot Against the Church” by the Catholic Portuguese newspaper “Agora”.

Nevertheless, the version predominant in Rome as in the world press, is that the sensational book was prepared by no more or less than distinguished elements of the Roman Curia, which is, as is known, the supreme government of the Church, auxiliary of His Holiness the Pope in the highest functions. It is repeatedly affirmed that the work “The Plot Against the Church” is one of the greatest efforts of the Roman Curia to cause the destruction of those reforms which the left wing of the Catholic clergy is attempting to bring about, reforms which, if realized, would completely subvert the bases on which the Holy Church rests. There are newspapers which have been even more explicit, which affirm that it was the so-called “Syndicate of Cardinals” who prepared the book. It is necessary to explain that the Masons, the communists, and their accomplices have given the name “Syndicate of Cardinals” to the heroic group of Cardinals of the Roman Curia who are struggling in the Second Vatican Council to prevent a group of the clergy — which in a strange manner is found at the service of Masonry and communism — from imposing on the Holy Synod a whole series of theses, subversive, and some heretical, designed to cause the ruin of the Church. Such ruin will never be consummated, because it is written: “the gates of Hell shall not prevail against her”, although the Apocalypse of Saint John also prophesises that such infernal forces will achieve great temporal triumphs, after which they will be conquered and destroyed.

So as not to prolong this Prologue, we will only transcribe in continuation that which an important Latin American newspaper has to say regarding Masonic and communist tendencies. We refer to the weekly “Tiempo” published in Mexico City by Mr. Martin Luiz Guzman, a distinguished Hierarch of Masonry, who says in referring to the Bishops called progressive: “The rebellion of the Bishops was considered as the beginning of heresy by Ottaviani and other Cardinals of the ‘Syndicate’. Even the possibility that the Council would depose the Pope if it considered him a heretic, was mentioned in ‘L’Osservatore Romano’. The ‘Syndicate’ (of Cardinals) then published, in October 1962, a libel entitled ‘Plot Against the Church’, having the pseudonym ‘Maurice Pinay’.” (Number 1119, Volume XIII, page 60, October 14, 1963). So much for the comment of the above mentioned newspaper.

What gives this book definite, provable worth is that it deals with a magnificent and imposing compilation of documents and sources of undeniable importance and authenticity, which demonstrates with no room for doubt the existence of a great conspiracy, which the traditional enemies of the Church have prepared against Holy Catholic Church, and against the Free World. These (enemies) are attempting to convert Catholicism into a blind instrument in the service of communism, Masonry, and Judaism, in order to weaken free humanity with it and to facilitate its ruin and, with this ruin, the definite victory of atheistic communism. The most useful instruments in this conspiracy are those Catholic clergymen who, betraying Holy Church, attempt to destroy her most loyal defenders, while at the same time they assist, in every way they can, Communists, Masons and Jews in their subversive activities.

In this edition, we attempt to alert not only Catholics, but also all the anti-communists of Venezuela and of Latin America, so that they may realize the grave dangers which at present threaten not only the Catholic Church, but Christianity and the free world in general, and so that they may offer all their support to that deserving group of Cardinals, Archbishops and Bishops who are now fighting in the Vatican Council and in their respective countries against the external and internal enemies of the Holy Church and of the free world; those enemies which, with satanic perseverance, are trying to destroy the most sacred traditions of Catholicism, and to submerge us and our children in frightful communist slavery.

THE EDITOR,
Caracas, Venezuela, December 15, 1963.


Sensationell är i sanning Maurice Pinays bok - en bok som alla kristna MÅSTE läsa! Klicka därför nu omedelbart på länken ovan och LÄS! Spara sedan boken som pdf-fil. Tipsa sedan alla du känner om boken. Må Gud stå oss alla bi i denna tid av kris...